Emergent Assembly Chirality and Flip Kinematics: Euclidean Stabilizers of the Frame Classes, Enantiotopic Faces of the C2h Core, and Initiator Capping of the Interior Lattice

Authors

  • Charles D. Schaper, Ph.D.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68366/r2wxe526

Keywords:

Chrysene Formalism, assembly chirality, Euclidean stabilizer, registry reversal, conformational bias, initiator capping

Abstract

The canonical planar chrysene carbon framework has point group $C_{2h}$ and no reflection symmetry within its plane. We establish that its locant involution is induced by the in-plane half-turn $C_2(z)$; no proper face-exchanging rotation preserves the same carbon footprint. We then separate the finite registry classification from its geometric realization. Under an explicit faithful, reflection-equivariant decorated-realization hypothesis, a species-symmetric stack is achiral precisely when its alignment field is palindromic. At length $l=6$, the $32$ fields comprise $8$ achiral fields and $24$ chiral fields forming $12$ mirror pairs. Uniform endogenous draws are racemic at the ensemble level, whereas ideal placement can select one member of a pair. A unique asymmetric terminal cap removes the candidate nonidentity stabilizers under the stated layer-preservation and realization conditions. The imported matched-source model yields an initiator surplus of $19.8$ units per period, exceeding the separate resource demands of $1$, $9$, or $18$ caps; saturated in-layer placement is available only on the compatible boundary columns, while other columns require external overhangs. Finally, a finite arm-sign model partitions the $D$ and $T$ states by stabilizer and gives an explicit orientation bias for fixed, identical anti or mixed states. Thermal restoration of blindness follows from invariance of the joint conformational measure under a single-partner half-turn. A correlated anti-state counterexample shows why symmetric one-unit marginals alone do not suffice. Exact enumeration, new verification code, and finite Lean certificates support the algebraic statements; the geometric and chemical interpretation is stated through explicit realization assumptions.

Three-tier graphical abstract for Article 91. Tier one separates exact core kinematics from conditional decorated-assembly chirality: a C2h core has no proper facial-turnover symmetry preserving its footprint, while under faithful reflection-equivariant realization the 32 length-six registry fields divide into 8 achiral fields and 24 chiral fields forming 12 mirror pairs. Tier two shows an asymmetric I cap at one end of a T column, the conditional trivial stabilizer, and mean resource surplus 208x minus 1, equal to 19.8 at x=0.1. Six basal columns allow saturated in-layer caps, while all nine require external overhangs at incompatible sites. Tier three contrasts locked conformer bias with annealed blindness: D sign states split 2 C2 and 2 Ci, T states split 4 C2, 4 Ci and 8 C1; energy difference is 4 n_anti epsilon. Invariance under transforming one partner of the joint measure gives equal partition sums. Correlated anti pairs provide a counterexample to a marginal-symmetry-only claim.

Published

2026-11-06

Issue

Section

Original Research (Research Articles)

How to Cite

[1]
C. Schaper, “Emergent Assembly Chirality and Flip Kinematics: Euclidean Stabilizers of the Frame Classes, Enantiotopic Faces of the C2h Core, and Initiator Capping of the Interior Lattice”, ACF, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1836–1846, Nov. 2026, doi: 10.68366/r2wxe526.